Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honky Tonk Confidential
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 00:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Honky Tonk Confidential (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band that fails WP:BAND. Contested PROD. — Jeff G. ツ 14:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per apparent failure to follow WP:BEFORE. When I removed the PROD tag I indicated that coverage exists. See Allmusic bio and review, and Google News - coverage from the Washington Post, PopMatters, New York Times, etc. The article needs improvement, not deletion, and we don't need to waste the time of several editors on this discussion. --Michig (talk) 15:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Passes WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 17:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the article needs to be Wikified very badly (I will add an edit tag) but sources indicate that the group has achieved some notability. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:27, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.