- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 22:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Jason Jessee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non notable, poorly sources, doesn't meet wp BIO NewAtThis (talk) 05:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[reply]
Delete per meNewAtThis (talk) 05:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is superfluous to enter your own vote, since AFD is based on consensus. --Dhartung | Talk 06:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I will vote however i please.68.27.12.1 (talk) 10:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable early pro skateboarder with his own 2004 documentary.[1][2] Needs sourcing. --Dhartung | Talk 06:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Alchemy12 (talk) 08:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Article needs expansion, not deletion. Plenty of coverage reliable secondary sources including the San Francisco Chronicle [3] and many more [4]. - Dravecky (talk!) 01:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - In depth SF Chronicle article plus others represent reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 00:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep as disruptive nomination by banned sockpuppeteer. Jfire (talk) 01:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.